Archive for the ‘TDC’ Category

Policy makers bury heads in the sand

Thursday, November 12th, 2009

Kiran Chug, writing in the Dominion Post today, draws our attention to new predictions from the Antarctic Research Centre: “Scientists are predicting seas will rise higher than the levels the Environment Ministry advises local councils to plan for. The director of the Antarctic Research Centre, Tim Naish, said the international community now believed sea levels could rise by 1.9 metres. Dr Naish said he believed that the new figures would impress the urgency of the problem upon policy makers. They were particularly relevant for New Zealand, where such a large portion of the population lived on the coastline, he said.” —Dominion Post

Meanwhile Environment Minister Nick Smith is reported as saying his office plans to stick with previous predictions of a rise of 59 cms.

Earth system scientists continue to warn that while Earth has powerful self-correcting mechanisms the ways in which these mechanisms will achieve their end may be detrimental to man. It is a half century since James Lovelock invented the electron capture detector (the device that detected CFCs in the upper atmosphere and the hole in the ozone layer, sparking this whole debate); but world leaders are still trying to arrive at any kind of a workable accord with which to go ahead and make meaningful globally-scoped changes.

What does this mean for Timaru’s South Beach? Well, hopefully it means would-be developers will find it hard to convince investors their money is safe. At least until the next IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) report is published in 2013 it may be hard to finance major projects as close to existing sea level as South Beach. After the publication of the next IPCC report it may be impossible for would-be developers to finance such projects.

Exploratory works south of Queen Street

Wednesday, October 15th, 2008

Washington Drilling

Washingtons Drilling & Exploration were on the foreshore today, they’re getting core samples. I was asked what I was doing taking this photograph, and quizzed about whether I thought I was trespassing. There’ll be a fence and security guards next. I hope the guards know that I, like them, am a shareholder. Older residents say there was dumping of toxic waste, along by the Queen Street crossing. That’s a subject everybody’s going to skirt around if they can. Perhaps it would be better to investigate it now, rather than after a powdered milk store has been built there. Certainly there was general dumping by the railways. What is more amazing is that the 50-year hazard line goes right through the proposed development site. What do investors make of that?

Milk Store No 2 looms

Friday, October 3rd, 2008

South Beach test pits

We’re not sure if the Timaru ratepayers would be aware that Prime Port plan a second milk store. It would be so big that it would extend from the existing milk store right down to the old block works abutment, and would completely dominate the foreshore. Anyway, the test pits dug two weeks ago were exploratory to check out the foundations. The two test pits shown in the photograph mark the southern-most footings. Presumably the fence with the signs saying ‘no access’ will be quite a bit south of that again. Why is it that our council are so arrogant that they think projects of this scale can win approval without public consultation? Or do they keep these things quiet hoping to advance them to the point of no return before we find out? Legally Prime Port may be within their rights, but is it not ill-timed with milk prices at a twenty-year low, with the big container ships gone, with a tug we don’t need still to be paid for, with the first store far from full, and with large vacant sections of the port industrial zone unconsolidated and under-utilised? The Port Company returned a marginal profit this year, but next year isn’t going to look so good. Unless of course they can do some clever stuff with utilisation of the land. Is it that we actually need this shed? Or is it simply property speculation at a time when most people have the sense to be tightening their belts, instead of sticking their necks out?

Rough computer sketch showing the impact of the proposed structure

  A rough computer sketch showing the scale of the proposed structure.

Proposal withdrawn

Friday, May 2nd, 2008

Today the developer withdrew the “Application for land use consent No.6739 proposed Betts Tribute Centre” adjacent to Patiti Point. Friends of Patiti Point are very relieved to hear this news, because for the time being at least the threat of an unwanted development has been removed. People who love the area should stay alert to the fact that this piece of land will possibly now be offered on the open market, and somebody may buy it, and they too may want to develop it in ways that are not appropriate. Meanwhile, we can relax, and enjoy!

Bring it on

Thursday, May 1st, 2008

This was the sight that greeted early morning visitors to Patiti Point May 1st. The developer put the rocks there the night before, claiming he was only blocking off “his property”. In the sober light of day the barricade looked a bit pathetic, and it was soon removed.

Rocks block the entrance to the reserve

Nothing special

Wednesday, April 23rd, 2008

Nothing special about today: 2.1 m tide; barometer 1010; moderate swell from the south. But look where the sea got to at high tide!

Wave run-up in moderate conditions at Patiti Point

The NZ Govt document Coastal Hazards and Climate Change: A guidance manual for local government in New Zealand warns of the following impacts on New Zealand’s coastal areas due to accelerating sea-level rise:

  • increased coastal erosion in some areas. Parts of the coastline that have historically been eroding may experience
  • increased erosion trends; other areas that may have been relatively stable may begin to erode;
  • permanent high-tide inundation of very low-lying margins that may at present experience only episodic inundation;
  • episodic sea flooding of higher coastal and estuarine margins;
  • drainage problems in adjacent low-lying areas, especially where gravity is relied on;
  • increased rates and frequency of episodic wave run-up and overtopping of both natural and man-made coastal defences.

The manual continues by warning about the increased hazard created by the removal of coastal vegetation, and risks associated with storm surge, “where adverse winds and low barometric pressure produced by storms temporarily elevate the ocean level well above the predicted tide level” and wave run-up which is, “treated separately from storm-tide level because it varies widely along the coast, even in the same locality, due to differences in shoreline steepness and type of natural or artificial coastal barrier.”

People who frequent South Beach near Patiti Point will tell you that the wave patterns and the shoreline steepness change from day to day in this locality, and that it is an increasingly common occurrence for the waves to roll right up the beach and fill pools behind the main wall of shingle.

Desecration of a sacred site

Friday, December 14th, 2007

Tuesday 11th December Jeff Elston, Pam Booth, Ian Waite and Sue Lowe attended a council meeting, and Jeff presented some facts about the historical significance of several sites contained in an area from Coupland’s building in the north to the lagoon at Otipua in the south. From north to south: a whalers lookout; the original government landing services site; the place (at the bottom of Queen Street) where Bishop Selwyn held the first ever divine service in South Canterbury; the Hine te Kura stream; the Hine te Kura encampment; Wellers whaling station 1838-1845; Peeress Town 1874-1888; an archeological site at Patiti Point Reserve itself; and the Tipua lagoon where the remains of a giant were found. Jeff gave a lucid account, painting a picture of an area of considerable historical significance, his opinion well-supported with documentation. The Historic Places Trust requirements are all in evidence: aesthetic, archaeological, cultural, historical, spiritual, and traditional qualities. This may be a place of sacred significance to Maori. There were no questions, and each of the councilors received a package for their later perusal.

New Mission Statement

Friday, December 7th, 2007

When I arrived in Timaru from the UK ten years ago, seeing the town that would be my new home for the first time, I thought what a charming but hotch-potch place it was. Everywhere I looked I saw pragmatic solutions: a spindly pedestrian bridge linking the seamens mission to the red light district; a port feeder road like a helter skelter borrowed from the fairground below; a carpark on a roof; a statue facing the public toilets. It’s like nobody planned the place, it just grew up organically like a child’s railway layout. I was amazed to be in a country where I could choose any design for my house and plonk it down much as I pleased within a reasonably flexible framework of rules. Fast forward to now and I start to see the problem: the short-term approach to planning is coming home to roost. The port sprawling southwards because it’s too hard to consolidate the already-developed port industrial zone. Nowhere to put a feeder road into the port, clip-on proposals like the North Street overpass competing with brute force solutions like driving a four-lane highway down Evans Street. A funeral home that wants to shift to Recreation 2 from beneath an overpass that isn’t even going to be there. My suggestion is that the town planners are given a six-month sabbatical to tour provincial towns around the world and observe other people’s solutions to similar problems. When they come back they should be given greater authority, and should not have closed networks of entrepreneurs pushing their arms up their backs. This is a town in need of a new mission statement, a common agenda, a code of ethics, and a systems approach to a cohesive plan for its future. The Council are very helpful in providing information when one asks, but I believe a more public display of proposed projects would alleviate suspicion, and would help us all feel engaged in the process, and subsequently engender pride in our town.

Tsunami

Monday, November 26th, 2007

The Tsunami discussion was raised by N. Leary who wrote in the Timaru Herald letters to the editor on 23rd November 2007: “It’s not if, but when, the big wave comes. How safe will the complex be? This on top of the Government stating during the year that no permits would be given for coastal development because of the chance of rising sea levels.” It would be useful to have a reference for that Government statement, and if anyone can find it we’d be much obliged.

Just trying to get a handle on what the risk at the site in question really is I went to the NIWA site and looked around. The most recent event of any significance appears to have been on the 18th November 2006: “wave heights recorded here in New Zealand were … 0.58 metres at Timaru” [link].

High tide at South Beach
 
Apparently the wave made the 9600 kms journey at an average speed of 685 kms/hr. While 0.58 metres doesn’t sound very high, neither is the elevation of the site in question. When I’m standing with my feet in the surf at high water springs I can see the grass on the site, making it about 1.8 metres above MHWS.

A wee footnote here, I found this: “Coastal urban planning needs to take sea level rise into account because its effects will be apparent during the typical replacement time of urban infrastructure such as buildings (before about 70 years). For local planning, ideally a risk assessment methodology may be employed to estimate the risk caused by sea level rise. In many locations, planning thresholds would also have to be considered in the light of possible changes in storm surge climatology due to changes in storm frequency and intensity, and (in some locations) changes to return periods of riverine flooding. In the medium term (decades), urban beaches will need beach re-nourishment and associated holding structures such as sea walls. Changes in storm and wave climatology are crucial factors for determining future coastal erosion.” (Walsh et al., 2004).

Walsh, K. Betts, H. et al (2004) “Using Sea Level Rise Projections for Urban Planning in Australia” Journal of Coastal Volume 20, Issue 2 (April 2004) pp. 586–598. [Online] Available from: here. (Accessed: 20th December 2007).

Due process

Thursday, October 25th, 2007

Scott Vincent, Keith Millington, and Sue Lowe met with TDC Regulatory Officer Peter Thompson today. Topics discussed included the regulatory process, limited and public notification, the timeline and other matters of process.